Thursday, January 13, 2011 - 6:17 PM

Tunisians didn't need any more reasons to protest when they took to the streets these past weeks -- food prices were rising, corruption was rampant, and unemployment was staggering. But we might also count Tunisia as the first time that WikiLeaks pushed people over the brink. These protests are also about the country's utter lack of freedom of expression -- including when it comes to WikiLeaks.
Tunisia's government doesn't exactly get a flattering portrayal in the leaked State Department cables. The country's ruling family is described as "The Family" -- a mafia-esque elite who have their hands in every cookie jar in the entire economy. "President Ben Ali is aging, his regime is sclerotic and there is no clear successor," a June 2009 cable reads. And to this kleptocracy there is no recourse; one June 2008 cable claims: "persistent rumors of corruption, coupled with rising inflation and continued unemployment, have helped to fuel frustration with the GOT [government of Tunisia] and have contributed to recent protests in southwestern Tunisia. With those at the top believed to be the worst offenders, and likely to remain in power, there are no checks in the system."
Of course, Tunisians didn't need anyone to tell them this. But the details noted in the cables -- for example, the fact that the first lady may have made massive profits off a private school -- stirred things up. Matters got worse, not better (as surely the government hoped), when WikiLeaks was blocked by the authorities and started seeking out dissidents and activists on social networking sites.
As PayPal and Amazon learned last year, WikiLeaks' supporters don't take kindly to being denied access to the Internet. And the hacking network Anonymous launched an operation, OpTunisia, against government sites "as long as the Tunisian government keep acting the way they do," an Anonymous member told the Financial Times.
As in the recent so-called "Twitter Revolutions" in Moldova and Iran, there was clearly lots wrong with Tunisia before Julian Assange ever got hold of the diplomatic cables. Rather, WikiLeaks acted as a catalyst: both a trigger and a tool for political outcry. Which is probably the best compliment one could give the whistle-blower site.
Yikes ... in the words of Peter Rodino, "let us look before we leap."
While Tunisian President Ben Ali tonight promised not to seek a new term in 2014 & stated he would establish an independent inquiry into recent events, who can say what the next political national identity will be?
North Africa has seen the crazed violence that comes with elected regimes and elections that fail and falter, (Algeria) and such an out come in Tunisia would introduce great fodder for the radical Islamist virus that takes any weak host to its knees readily.
As is the case with anarchist behavior, Wikileaks has no world view; the consequences of acts that appear 'fun' and 'in your face' are that others get to die.
The regime may be "sclerotic" but a hard place transitions easier than a necrotic one. Beware of what comes from crisis here.
The Army has retreated from the cities and the burbs but 'special forces' remain and the cease fire that was promulgated over last night failed. Live rounds are being used and the word of mouth on the street is that manifestations will continue on.
We will see if the President's announcement will lance the boil(s) or fester them.
I have to keep reminding myself that this is about Tunisia and not India.
Hopefully the US soon as well...Obummers got to go...
Hopefully this will trigger a movement to get rid of the socialists. I along with many others want to see obama and administration out of office. I would rather see the government shut down, stop everything rather than see his plans for the US get implemented. It is just a matter of time before a disillusioned electorate will hit the street with weapons to force a change.
This has nothing to do with Obama
Guess what? We live in a Democracy. Obama is a duly elected President. You will live with him until his terms are over just like I lived with Bush. Case closed.
I don't think wikileaks is the catalyst
wasn't the catalyst the man who set himself on fire because the government took away his fruit cart, which led to people protesting in support? or were the protests happening before he killed himself?
Exactly! It's JUST ABOUT THE MAN. The spreading of the censored Wikileaks(but not this was censored and the source of the revolution) just took place later..
The Author seriously need to do more research.
Former Tunisian UN Ambassador Ahmed Ounaies (on BBC World News) --
"[...] the reports published through WikiLeaks has played a role in the upsurge"
I'm sure patriotic Americans will not have a problem with this.
http://hunchar.blogspot.com/2011/01/was-wikileaks-catalyst-for-tunisian.html
The only way democracy, tolerance, and understanding is by letting people know the truth. No weapon is more powerful than truth.
"WikiLeaks was blocked by the authorities and started seeking out dissidents and activists on social networking sites. "
Makes it sound like WikiLeaks was seeking out dissidents. In fact it was the Tunisian authorities who were spoofing FaceBook pages and collecting information from users, presumably to identify them.
Credit to the Tunisian people: not Wikileaks
This article seems to be cobbled together as a quick attempt to claim to be the first to "spot" a Wikileak revolution, but it only shows how ill informed and incapable of reflection the author is.
Here's an idea for Elizabeth: it's not the west, the western media, Julian Assange or Wikileaks that inspire people in opressed countries. The west and its opinions are not the centre of the world nor an inspiration for change. Do you think Mohammed Bouazizi gave a damn about anything like Wikileaks as he made the dramatic decision to take his own life? No: he thought close to home, he thought of the lack of the prospects, the lack of employment opportunities, the corruption, and the lack of voice for his peers.
The ensuing protests were inspired by his actions. After years of silence, the youth of Tunisia had found a symbol that embodied their frustration. They were shocked, moved and effected by the display of his despair. They took to the streets because they themselves had fought the same demons of despair. After his death, they rioted in anger and anguish to not let his death be in vain.
To suggest that this revolution is because of Wikileaks, twitter or anything but the power of the Tunisian people is an insult to proper journalism and an insult to the Tunisian people themselves.
Wikileaks sparked the Tunisian revolution? Please. This article is an ill informed puff job from an Assange sympathizer.
Bottom line: Assange is a public enemy, a terrorist who needs to be killed. As a soldier in the U.S. Army, I would be honored to be assigned the task of doing it. Otherwise, I'd be happy to pay for the munitions. It would be a rare, well-spent tax dollar.
My best wishes go out to the Tunisian people. I hope this works out well for them. But if it does, few will be deluded enough to belief that Julian Assange had anything positive to do with it.
I would rather Assange spend the rest of his life in a Gitmo cage. Your method doesn't give him time for remorse. I am sure decades in solitary confinement, with no internet, no women to rape, no sycophants to posture before, no media to pontificate to... he’ll have plenty of time to reflect on the error of his ways... when he gets old and needs expensive health care then implement your method of dealing with him.
A solider would not make a coward of himself by publicly enticing the assassination of another person, as you just did.
JMBRELAND
Well, foreign policy says it all - its lets the rest of us know how Americans are feeling about "everyone else". Let me alert you to how many of us (that's the everyone else mob) feel - you scare the daylights out of us. Many of us will never ever step foot in your country because we think you are all gun-toting maniacs.
Incidentally, I should also alert you to the cold hard fact that many people are quite happy where they are and don't feel the need to go to your country (I'm just trying to cover the bases so that you don't fall into the trap of thinking everyone who disagrees with you is 'jealous'). I for one, travel a bit and will die happy (hopefully of old age) and proud of never having been to your country.
Leaks such as those coming through from Wikileaks are inevitable with the technology available these days - wikileaks will continue through many and varied sources. Your desperate need to kill someone for these releases no longer shocks - the "everyone else" mob knows that you haven't yet connected the dots. Do you have a baseline in how many need to be killed to satiate your rage at getting a dose of the truth? One man will surely not be enough - maybe whoever replaces the one you have in your sights? Maybe everyone that owns a computer or uses the internet?
For people who kill more of eachother each month that were killed in 9/11, I am surprised that Tunisia makes it onto your radar (or gun sights). Pull your head in and think about the consequences before you shoot your mouth off (or your firearm). Respect for life, not its destruction, should be your primary concern.
Um, you have to remember that this publication is basically a Department of State online magazine and some of the DoS types totally freak when some one mentions direct action. As for the JA that posted "You Are No Soldier"; how the Frick would you know? Army leadership manuals stress that immediate discipline and reward is conductive to good military leadership. So crawl back into your cave cyber troll.
Mr. Assange is not a public enemy of any type. He simply reported the truth that those in power did not want said. Just like in Tunisa.
As a soldier you took an oath to defend and uphold the CONSTITUTION of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Your oath, you took it. The CONSTITUTION protects the press. It protects free speech. It protects against unlawful acts, such as assassination, by anyone.
America is not the greatest country in history because you were born here. It is because it was founded on principles, not power. Those principles being a government with limited power, with built in checks and balances, and with individual freedom.
If you disagree with Assange, fine. Your right. Your privilege. Me, I think he just really pissed those in power off. He will never be convicted of any crime my an American court. In fact, the Attorney General of the US huffed and puffed, but did nothing. Because there was no crime committed.
We've been waiting a long time for Wikileaks
People all around the world finally have a foolproof method to hold their particular government accountable. Wikileaks has opened a new paradigm that returns the power back to the people, and takes it away from the elite few who have refused for too long to allow the proper oversight into how they use our tax dollars, and how they operate in our name. No longer will the public be held hostage by back room dealings used to start wars, and execute decisions that are not of the common good.
"People all around the world finally have a foolproof method to hold their particular government accountable."
*******************
Wikileaks foolproof? Wikileaks, like any other media outlet can be manipulated. The credibility and motivations of the mainstream media have already been shown to be suspect. To believe that the motivations of Wikileaks and its owners are pure as the wind driven snow is as naive as to believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. There's nothing like a few well crafted lies sprinkled in amongst the truth (or perceived truth) to get the masses seething, especially if the source is considered foolproof.
Who elected you caesar, Julius? But seriously, it’s good to see that you take responsibility for the riots in Tunisia. It’s rare to see someone take ownership for the blood on their hands, as you have.
Look, if these Tunisia are as poor and struggling as we hear..... Just how are they able to afford internet, computers and such and if they are censored by their country leaders.......... How did WIKI...WIKI get to all of them and cause all of this trouble
This country is in the same state of being as Red China and our COUNTRY is right behind them.
Jack Nicholson was right about the court-martialed Marine
The only way democracy, tolerance, and understanding is by letting people know the truth. No weapon is more powerful than truth.
This is the sort of half-baked observation that passes for wisdom. However, historical experience teaches us otherwise in the majority of cases when unpleasant realities are verified by well-meaning do-gooders----either the government reacts violently against its people or vice versa, causing the sort of catastrophe that the French Revolution and other uprisings resulted in. Those do-gooders are often the first to be killed----as in the Iranian demonstrations after the stolen election. Revolutions always devour their own children. Just ask Robespierre and thousands of other French revolutionaries.
Amen.
Truth is required to make informed decisions. That is why there use to be a free press. There use to be investigative reporters. Now, with all of our technology, truth is buried and then attacked.
But, as Churchill said, "The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is."
So, we keep searching for the truth.
I find it laughable that you consider yourself part of the everyone else mob. Do you count terrorists and other criminals as part of your crowd? You brag about never coming to my country as if I should care. If you are so threatened by the thought of free people who have the right to arm and defend themselves then I doubt you have the courage to do what is right. I hope you gain the wisdom some day to see the ignorance of your statement.
smashicus (how cute! - violence is THE answer)
I knew full well that one of those gun-toting lunatics I was talking about would have a little dummy spit. Why is it laughable that I'm part of the everyone else mob? I clearly ain't one of your mob. Just like GWB - 'if you're not with us, then you're against us'!!
Linking your ability to arm yourself with a firearm with notions of courage - my goodness, your country really is on the slippery slope - you don't even understand that the language you use is designed to intimidate (or maybe you do). What is this courage you speak of? The courage to kill?
You say I don't have the courage to do what is right - because you own a gun you are a truth-maker?? You determine right from wrong?? Do you point a gun at your local priest and tell him right from wrong? The posting that led to me participating in this discussion was the outright call for the assassination of an individual who has not been convicted (or even charged) with a crime. Incitement to murder used to be a crime. But because I don't own a gun, you suggest my ability to know what is right is somehow impaired?
Ignorant? Ignorant of what? of arming myself? Yes - I don't live in a war zone like your country where you kill each other with alarming regularity. Would I get wisdom by holding or owning a gun? Do I get wisdom by shooting someone?
You post is a disturbing example of the lack of reason that is peppered throughout comments on wikileaks in many forums. Not very funny at all.
and ignore the message, ignore the real criminal and corrupt, that is the cause of the uprising. Wikileaks is the bad guy and whipping boy, ANYTHING but protest outlaw regimes, in Tunisa and elsewhere, including the USA.
If I outlive Assange, I will write to the Pope for a set of halo and wings for him. FINALLY REAL investigative jounalism. Those who stand against him prefer propaganda and the comfy zone called normalcy bias.
THERE IS NOTHING NORMAL much less acceptable about the outlaw regimes in power today. Good for the Tunisians staring down the devil and spitting in his face.
78 people are dead, 98 injured (so far) in the violence that ensued after WikiLeaks released this information.
This is what happens when amateurs play at diplomacy without regard for the consequences.
i think that the issue is not wikileads but the safty off our networks,
WikiLeaked is FP’s blog dedicated to sorting through and making sense of the more than 250,000 State Department cables acquired by WikiLeaks.
Read More
(28)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE